Hamilton at the
Public Theater
Lin-Manuel Miranda as Alexander Hamilton in Hamilton.
Try if you
may to describe Hamilton, the new
musical by and starring Lin-Manuel Miranda now running at the Public Theater
through April 5. To call it perfect is
simplistic. It is sublime, a testament
to the supreme creative power of Mr. Miranda and, indeed, the American
people. It exists outside the boundaries
of reasonable expectations for musical theater; it is the best offering of this
season, of any in recent memory, and, some might argue, of any season at
all. To any embittered malcontent who
may find fault with this objectively staggering offering from the man who may
well be the greatest musical theater artist working today, I am reminded of
Shakespeare’s meter in King John: “To
gild refined gold, to paint the lily, / To throw perfume on the violet… Is
ridiculous excess.” Hamilton cannot be improved.
I loved it so much I feel almost indecent discussing it.
Our
principals are, naturally, Alexander Hamilton (Miranda), a West Indian
immigrant who rose by virtue of his own brilliance to the position of our
nation’s first Secretary of the Treasury; Hamilton’s loves — his wife Eliza
(Philippa Soo) and sister-in-law Angelica (Renée Elise Goldsberry); and
Hamilton’s political nemesis and eventual killer, Aaron Burr (Leslie Odom,
Jr.). These are our guides through the
ethereal wonderland, some fantastical intersection between the Secretary’s mind
and the real world of the eighteenth century from the Revolution to 1804, that
Mr. Miranda has built over these past six years. And what guides! Mr. Miranda is, as usual, in top form
onstage — his actorly integrity combined with a highly intelligent flow
contribute jointly to a star turn to match or exceed his winning portrayal of
convenience store manager Usnavi in 2008’s In
the Heights (which he also composed).
Ms. Soo and Ms. Goldsberry are bewitching and deeply felt, and Ms.
Goldsberry especially offers a preview of what is sure to be a long and
rewarding career — she sings the hell out of anything she’s given.
As for Mr. Odom, I am at a loss for
words. Together he and Mr. Miranda make
Burr not a one-dimensional villain but a tragic hero, held back by his own
reticence and natural proclivity to play it close to the vest (his first solo
number, after all, is a tour de force called “Wait for It”). This Aaron Burr, like Judas in Andrew Lloyd
Weber’s Jesus Christ Superstar,
narrates the piece, and the dramaturgical intelligence of this decision is
confirmed during a scene where Hamilton trades away the rights to the
geographical location of the country’s new capital in exchange for the votes
for his new financial plan. Burr, stuck
on the outside looking in once again, snaps, and performs one of the many
candidates for the score’s best song, “The Room Where it Happens,” which
instills a drive for power which leads, eventually, to the downfalls of both
Hamilton and Burr. Don’t get me wrong — I
can’t stop thinking about Mr. Miranda’s performance, either. But In
the Heights could have been a one-man-show without jettisoning any really
important numbers or dramatic development.
With Hamilton, Mr. Miranda has
written a showcase for the best ensemble on the stage today with the finesse of
someone much later in his career than he.
And first and foremost among this
ensemble are two phenomenally talented men who, when this show transfers to
Broadway, will be giving Mr. Odom a run for his money in the Best Supporting
Actor department.
The first — After leaving the Public
in a state of semi-dazed exuberance, my first thought was that I wished I could
have spent more time with two of Mr. Miranda’s characters—the exquisitely
French Marquis de Lafayette and the flamboyant, grandstanding Thomas
Jefferson. How convenient for
posterity’s sake that they are both portrayed by rapper Daveed Diggs, whose incredible
dedication to his roles and audience-pleasing comic dexterity will ensure his
permanent welcome on the stage should he choose to return to it.
The second — Oh, the second. There are certain performers in this world
whose mere presence on a stage, even if it should last only a few minutes,
guarantees their immediate association with the production. People like this are called
“showstoppers.” And if this show can be
stopped, it is stopped by Bryan D’Arcy James.
Mr. James spends maybe ten minutes on the stage as King George III, the
prim, pompous monarch who watches from afar as control of the colonies slips
away. “You’ll Be Back,” his signature
number, is written with the assurance of Paul McCartney’s best pop-inflected
numbers from the early sixties, and performed with the clear-voiced delivery
of, well, Brian D’Arcy James. You’ll
leave the theater humming “You’ll Be Back,” but Mr. James’s brief minutes
breezily stopping by the show will stay with you longer than any earworm.
The
theatrical devices employed in this sung-through masterpiece are too numerous
to name. I was particularly partial to
cabinet-meeting rap battles between Hamilton and Jefferson, the wonderfully
staged ten-pace duels (there are several), and especially the cultural
references, which are surprisingly many.
I caught lines lifted lovingly from South
Pacific, The Pirates of Penzance,
The Last Five Years, 1776 (to which this musical’s parade of
quirky founding fathers could be endearingly compared), and Mr. Miranda’s own In the Heights. This is a winking acknowledgement of the
unique territory this musical occupies — historically self-referential in a more
blatant way than other period pieces have ever been. (After a dramatic love scene, Jefferson flounces
on-stage and complains, “Can we get back to politics?”)
This is
because the musical is all about preparing for your portrayal in the history
books. Hamilton succeeds in preserving
his legacy because he is reckless and non-stop in pursuit of his goals, while
more reserved characters like Burr end up with their names in the proverbial gutter. “I am not throwing away my shot,” Hamilton
repeatedly mutters. The knowledge that “History
Has Its Eyes on You” (as one of the song titles puts it) is prevalent, too, in 1776; the story is so familiar that we
can’t conceive of the founding fathers being unsure that their tales wouldn’t
be told hundreds of years later. But
from where I stand, this attitude comes naturally to Mr. Miranda because he is
so appealingly aware of his own talent, like Sondheim in his day (and now,
frankly). He knows he’s good because he,
like we lucky few, have seen Hamilton,
and have no doubt that the advent of a historically important artist is at
hand, and that we are witnessing the premiere of what may be his most important work.
No comments:
Post a Comment