Saturday, October 18, 2014

Twenty-Four Hours Gone Too Soon

On the Town at the Lyric Theatre
(L-R): Jay Armstrong Johnson, Tony Yazbeck, and Clyde Alves in On the Town.

            The revival of On the Town at the newly (and elegantly) restored Lyric Theatre, put simply, is a triumph in every sense.  It runs like clockwork; but clockwork is not powerful enough to describe the sheer spectacle of On the Town, so let us say this production is an engine that runs on magic.  Leonard Bernstein, Adolph Green, and Betty Comden’s magnificent score is, of course, robust as ever.  The performances, especially those of the three central characters, are splendiferous.  But perhaps most important, the choreography, by Joshua Bergasse (Smash) in the style of Jerome Robbins, godfather of this musical, flows like water across the Lyric’s expansive stage, filling the room with fire and force, until it finally expels the audience into the streets after two and a half glorious hours, singing and jigging as they go.
            There can be no doubt about it from the first moment those three voices cry “New York, New York!”… Throughout the history of musical theater there has been no musical quite like On the Town—its natural friendliness to the audience, its somehow simultaneously innocent and cosmopolitan tone, and its perfectly intertwined book, score, and dances.  Based on Robbins’ 1944 ballet “Fancy Free,” premiering that same year, and written when the creatives involved were, respectively, 26, 27, and 30, its air of wartime patriotism and intrinsic sense of joy have sustained its following seventy years after its premiere.  I grew up on the movie, as, probably, many others have, and though that 1949 Arthur Freed production included only three songs from the original production, it shared with the musical the sweet earnestness and hard-earned synchronicity that make them both so impressive.  Also, notably, they shared a legitimate New York connection—Gene Kelly insisted that exterior shots be produced on location in the city, at spots ranging from Rockefeller Center to the Museum of Natural History.  Significantly, that film cemented in the minds of the American public the identities of the three sailors who come bounding down into the Brooklyn Navy Yard at exactly 6 A.M.—Mr. Kelly, Frank Sinatra, and the underrated clown Jules Munshin.
            The cast of the new On the Town may not supplant them, but they may well equal them.  Needless to say, they are all fantastic singers, talented performers comic and tragic in equal measure, and absolutely transcendant dancers.  Ozzie is given fresh comic life by the leering Clyde Alves, who brings to mind The Mask-era Jim Carrey.  Jay Armstrong Johnson, who delivered a stunning performance in March’s Philharmonic staging of Sweeney Todd, turns on a dime to capture Chip’s convulsing nervousness with aplomb.  And Tony Yazbeck is marvelously expressive and multitalented as the lovestruck Gabey.  But for certain dance moves which bear a winking resemblance to those of Mr. Kelly, he proudly blazes his own trail through the part.  He is just one of two actors this season who seem to be making audience’s forget Gene Kelly’s name—Robert Fairchild, who is to star in another Kelly role in An American in Paris, inspired Alistair Macaulay to remark in the Times, “I prefer Mr. Fairchild.”
            Speaking of the illustrious Fairchilds, Robert’s wife, Megan Fairchild, a principal dancer with the New York City Ballet, plays the most notable of the female counterparts to those sailors on one day’s shore leave.  In her Broadway debut as Miss Turnstiles Ivy Smith, Ms. Fairchild not only brings to the show a dancing ability unmatched on the Broadway stage in recent memory (certainly not by a lead) but also a touching innocence as an actress and a voice rivalling that of any actress in the production.  Her presence onstage is a delight.
            The supporting cast is marvelous, too—the illustrious Jackie Hoffman lays waste to so many welcome comic characters you may wonder how she changes her costumes so quickly, and Michael Rupert (the shark-ish law professor in Legally Blonde) tries a different sort of role, the pushover Judge Pitkin, with pleasing results.

            All in all this cast, plus a score chock-full of too many hits to name, adds up to an evening of pleasure the likes of which it’s hard to imagine anyone’s seen since the time of the musical’s original run.  The singing of The Star-Spangled Banner before the curtain rises on the first act is a nice touch—for when the curtain falls, you will never feel prouder to live in a country where native hands have wrought such indelible masterpieces.

Monday, October 6, 2014

Cole Porter Adjacency, With a Few Jolts of Energy

Can-Can at the Paper Mill Playhouse
        The new version of Can-Can, at the Paper Mill Playhouse, directed and significantly edited by the Frasier co-creator David Lee, is buoyed by its near-perfect Cole Porter score but burdened by its lackluster execution.  Indeed, this story of the 1890s Montmarte club owner Pistache (Kate Baldwin) and her former paramour, Judge Aristide Forestier (Jason Danieley), seems to be held up by thin strings for most of the first act.  Ms. Baldwin floats through the production with a smarmy smirk permanently plastered across her face, and Mr. Danieley tries--and fails--to combine the swashbuckling attitudes of Errol Flynn with the lovestruck insecurity of Jimmy Stewart.  Backed by unimaginative sets (by Rob Bissinger), some great, top-of-his-game Porter ("Live and Let Live," "C'est Magnifique") slips by with relatively little fanfare.  It's white-bread, off-the-assembly-line direction by Mr. Lee, and the boring, unfunny book, co-written by Lee and Joel Fields, doesn't help matters.
        That is, until, near the middle of the second act, the cast bursts into the title number, which is not only by far the best song in the production but also one of Cole Porter's best songs ever.  Suddenly, the balanced exuberance that marks the greatest of Porter musicals and numbers is expressed, wildly and well, in the show itself.  The almost insane cleverness of Porter's lyrics is matched by visually inventive choreography by the Tony-winning Patti Colombo (Peter Pan), and the energy level jumps so jarringly it's as if someone has given the show an adrenaline shot.  "Can-Can," the number, seems like a visitor to Can-Can the show from some other, more intelligent production.  Wisely, Mr. Lee has lengthened the song and the dance number for this section of the production, and every second of it is joyous and trascendent.  It was greeted at the performance I attended with a nearly five-minute round of applause, and when, later, a reprise was announced, the theater nearly vibrated off its foundations.  As for me, I would have preferred to see the cast perform "Can-Can" (the song, not the show) continuously for two and a half hours than practically any other conceivable entertainment (including the show itself).  The number alone makes this production worth seeing.
        The phantasmagorical magic of this highlight extends itself over throughout the show, but moments like it are few and far between.  "Come Along With Me," sung by the magnificently sleazy Michael Berresse as villainous critic Hilaire Jussac, is quite a bit of fun, and "Never, Never Be an Artist" is perhaps the one moment of the production in which the comic relief (Greg Hildreth, Mark Price and Justin Robertson as a trio of starving artists) is actually comic.  But one can't escape the fact that the story (and most of Ms. Colombo's non can-can choreography) can sometimes fail to hold the audience's attention.  The most (unfortunately) memorable plot point of the second act comes when Jussac is brought to heel with a calculated reveal that not only makes no sense within the context of the story but also asks the audience to laugh at the character in a way that is summarily uncool.  The fact that this is preceded by one of the most inexpertly choreographed stage fights I've ever seen doesn't help the audience take the contrived happy ending seriously.  When Ms. Baldwin and Mr. Danieley embrace at show's end, the audience isn't interested, the way they should be, in the continuing story of these two lovers.  They're waiting for that final "Can-Can" they've been promised.  And when a single song, however brilliant, is the only thing anchoring a show to plausibility, that show isn't fully formed.  Cole Porter wouldn't be disappointed, but he certainly wouldn't be fascinated either.